Di Blog Nov 08


It’s been a fascinating month as I have been in two separate worlds, the world of here and now, doing presentations on how to set up community based tourism enterprises in Sulawesi in Indonesia, and the world of the future for wildlife, forests and the human race in Barcelona at the IUCN Conservation Congress and in Delhi, at a workshop that I helped bring together through my campaign called Travel Operators for Tigers entitled, ‘The last chance for Tigers’.

What strikes me so often with all this is the terrifying chasm between what we all know needs to be done – and done soon – to save the very ecosystems by which we exist, and the business as usual attitude that we find so much easier to understand and relate to, and which is what we have learnt to be the normal way of doing things.

The notion of ‘Ecosystem services’ or the ‘Value of natural biodiversity’ would hardly register on the radar of most tourism professionals even though it’s on these very services of clean water, pristine forests, unadulterated seas and natural biodiversity that our very industry exists. Of 8000 delegates at the conservation congress there were only 8 travel professionals – a damning inditement of my own Travel industry I feel, who so often pay lip service to the environment – more interested in how many pillows are in a lodge bedroom than the quality of the environment in which their clients exist.

In Barcelona the cost of ecosystem services is the hottest topic for most conservationists. How do we ‘value’ these services which today are not even valued, do not have a price tag – or even recognised as an asset base in any countries Gross National product.

I was privileged to be on a panel discussion with a host of luminaries including Pavan Sukdev, who recently published a groundbreaking report for the IUCN entitled the ‘The economics of Biodiversity’ looking at how economists, policymakers and conservationist can start to value these so called ‘free’ services in a way that creates much greater economic value to saving them, that polluting them or chopping them down.

As Pavan says ‘Every time you chop down a tree in a rainforest you are doing the equivalent of using up your own capital in the bank, destroying your own ability to finance yourself, or your economy in the future’. That tree may provide you with energy today to cook you food, but it would have provide you with a water reservoir, ensured you have clean air to breath, fertile soil to grow your food, health products and a over 14 other ‘services’ that we are only just beginning to try and put a price on today. By the time we have priced it up you and I will never be able to afford to chop down that tree – and won’t that be a good thing!

Mongabay.com’s weekly review of forest conservation, nature, and environmental stories in the news. By mongabay.com founder Rhett Butler. ============= The top forest news story of the week was the deepening conflict b/w Asia Pulp & Paper, an Indonesia based forestry company, and Greenpeace, an Activist group. On Sunday APP published a report claiming to exonerate it from charges that it illegally cleared rainforest and peatlands in Sumatra. The report was published by ITS Global, a consultancy tied to World Growth International, a lobby group that advocates conversion of natural forests for industrial plantations. World Growth International opposes forest conservation initiatives, including the proposed REDD program, which could compensate developing countries for protecting their forests. Greenpeace issued a response to the report, claiming that some of the charges levied by ITS Global are inaccurate or based on incomplete information. The conflict between Greenpeace and APP emerged after Greenpeace published a report – How Sinar Mas is pulping the planet – in July. The report alleged environmental transgressions by the companies that supply APP. APP has been under pressure from environmental groups for several years now, causing it to lose a number of major clients including Wal-Mart, Office Depot, and Staples. Research Conducted by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; the Natural History Museum, London; and IUCN found that 22% of the world’s plant species are threatened
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Find More Conservation Of Forests Articles

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.